RSS
 

Electronic Prescriptions on the Rise

05 Jul

An electronic prescription is any sent by computer to the pharmacy of choice. Federal programs offer incentives to physicians to file prescriptions electronically. So why is it that only 36 percent of doctors do so?

Sometimes progress can be slow, but there is and upward trend. That move upwards is being attributed to incentives offered by two federal programs that give physicians rewards for using the technology.

According to an annual report by Surescripts, which operates the nation's largest e-prescription network, about 50 percent of the physicians who take advantage of prescribing medications electronically are cardiovascular specialists, family physicians, or internists.

By the end of 2010, 190,000 physicians were e-prescribing medications. But if you include nurse practitioners and physician assistants that number jumps to 234,000, which is up from 156,000 in the previous year.

While it's estimated that only 36 percent of all doctors do electronic prescriptions it is promising to note that from 2009 to 2010 it increased by nearly 70 percent. One reason the increase isn't even higher is that controlled substances were not allowed to be transmitted electronically until the middle of 2010.

Rewards and Penalties

The federal government is offering incentives for doctors to switch over to the e-prescription model because it has cost-saving benefits similar to any electronic health records. They are more efficient, reduce healthcare costs, and increase patient safety through more accurate transcriptions and communications.

These incentives appear to be working and are in part responsible for the significant increase in e-prescriptions. Under the Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act, a law passed in 2009, doctors can receive a two percent Medicare bonus in 2010 if they e-prescribed using approved software. That bonus decreases by one percent in the next two years (2011 and 2012) then drops to 0.5 percent in 2013 and then no longer exists by 2014.

There are potential penalties as well. For 2012, doctors who do not report at least 10 electronic prescriptions in the first six months of 2011 on their Medicare claims, will receive a one percent pay cut.

Another significant incentive was introduced in the 2009 the legislation entitled the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. It authorizes up to $44,000 under Medicare over five years and nearly $64,000 under Medicare over six years for physicians who show “meaningful use” of an electronic health record system, which includes using e-prescriptions.

 

Less Anesthesia Needed Through Catheter

05 Jul

According to a study presented at the 2011 annual meeting of the Society of Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology, women who undergo a cesarean section  may only need half of the anesthesia dosage that is currently being administered if they are given and intrathecal catheter instead of a single spinal injection.

Among the sample of 10 patients who were given an intrathecal catheter, on average they only needed 0.6 and 1.1 mL of 0.75% hyperbaric bupivacaine to experience a T4 to T6 block, an amount which is 25-50 percent less than the published notices the same medication delivered in a single spinal injection.

The study's author J. Sudharma Ranasinghe, MD, associate professor of anesthesiology at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, recommended that clinicians opting for intrathecal catheters use slow, incremental dosing to ensure patients don't receive excessive anesthesia.

"If an adequate block can be achieved with less local anesthetic, bolus injection of a spinal medication that was intended for single-shot spinal through a spinal catheter may lead to high spinal block with respiratory difficulty, aspiration risk and severe hypotension," said Dr. Ranasinghe.

David Wlody, MD, professor of clinical anesthesiology at the State University of New York-Downstate Medical Center, in New York City thinks that it's a good idea look further into these findings, but cautions that such a small sample size and the lack of the control group makes its premature to jump to any conclusions.

 

Thomson Reuters Names its 100 Top Hospitals for 2011

18 May
Thomson Reuters has released its Thomson Reuters 100 Top Hospitals list for 2011. Far from being an arbitrary award, the top 100 hospital are run so well that researchers say if all Medicare inpatients received the same level of care as those in the top 100 hospitals, the following would happen:
 
– Almost 116,000 additional patients would survive every year.
– Over 197,000 patient health complications could be avoided each year.
– Expense per adjusted discharge would drop by $462.
– The average patient stay would decrease by half a day.
 
"This year’s 100 Top Hospitals award winners have delivered exemplary results, despite volatility from healthcare reform," said Jean Chenoweth, senior vice president at Thomson Reuters. "The leadership teams at these organizations have dealt with enormous ambiguity, yet remained focused on mission and excellence across the hospital which drove national benchmarks to new highs."
 
In order to come up with their 100 Top Hospitals, Thomson Reuters researchers evaluated 2,914 short-term, acute care, non-federal hospitals. They used public information from Medicare cost reports, Medicare Provider Analysis and Review (MedPAR) data and core measures and patient satisfaction data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Hospital Compare website. 
 
The Thomson Reuters 100 Top Hospitals were picked based on the evaluation of 10 performance areas at each hospital: mortality, medical complications, patient safety, average patient stay, expenses, profitability, patient satisfaction, adherence to clinical standards of care, post-discharge mortality and readmission rates for acute myocardial infarction (heart attack), heart failure, and pneumonia.
 
The hospitals were broken down into groups. So, for the sake of brevity, here are five winners from each category (go to healthcareitnews.com for the complete list):
 
Major Teaching Hospitals
 
– Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center – Chicago, Illinois
– Advocate Lutheran General Hospital – Park Ridge, Illinois
– Baystate Medical Center – Springfield, Massachusetts
– Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center – Boston, Massachusetts
– Brigham and Women’s Hospital – Boston, Massachusetts
 
Teaching Hospitals
 
– Aultman Hospital – Canton, Ohio
– Beaumont Hospital, Troy – Troy, Michigan
– Bronson Methodist Hospital – Kalamazoo, Michigan
– Bryn Mawr Hospital – Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania
– Carle Foundation Hospital – Urbana, Illinois
 
Large Community Hospitals 
 
– Advocate Good Samaritan Hospital – Downers Grove, Illinois
– Allegiance Health – Jackson, Michigan
– Baylor All Saints Medical Center at Fort Worth – Fort Worth, Texas
– Beverly Hospital – Beverly, Massachusetts
– Boone Hospital Center – Columbia, Missouri
 
Medium Community Hospitals
 
– Augusta Health – Fisherville, Virginia
– Aurora Sheboygan Memorial Medical Center – Sheboygan, Wisconsin
– Blanchard Valley Hospital – Findlay, Ohio
– Cleveland Clinic Florida – Weston, Florida
– Columbus Regional Hospital – Columbus, Indiana
 
Small Community Hospitals
 
– Andalusia Regional Hospital – Andalusia, Alabama
– American Fork Hospital – American Fork, Utah
– Baylor Medical Center at Waxahachie – Waxahachie, Texas
– Central Michigan Community Hospital – Mount Pleasant, Michigan
– Flaget Memorial Hospital – Bardstown, Kentucky
 
 

Obesity Raises Complication Risks with General Anesthesia

20 Apr

Obesity comes with many health risks, but what makes matters worse is that if you end up in the hospital for one of those health problems, being heavy can lead to complications with the anesthesia used in surgical procedures.

Researchers in the United Kingdom have found that obese patients have double the risk of non-obese patients of developing serious airway complications while they are under a general anesthetic. People who are severely obese were actually four times more likely to develop the same complications.

The researchers analyzed all major airway complications that occurred among patients in the UK who received general anesthesia between 2008 and 2009. The study focused on situations that led to severe consequences, such as the need for a breathing tube to be inserted in the front of the neck, being admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), brain damage or death.

The researchers also found that, while obese patients are more likely to die if they experienced airway complications in the ICU, when a breathing monitor called a capnograph is used, the chances of brain damage and death are greatly reduce

"The report is important for patients and anesthetists alike," said the study’s co-author Dr. Nick Woodall, a consultant anesthetist at the Norfolk and Norwich Hospital in the United Kingdom.

"The information will enable obese patients to be better informed about the risks of anesthesia and to give informed consent. We hope our findings will encourage anesthetists to recognize these risks and choose anesthetic techniques with a lower risk, such as regional anesthesia, where possible, and also prepare for airway difficulties when anesthetizing obese patients," said Woodall.

Most of the major health complications that come with being obese present major risks for complications while under anesthesia. Heart risks, blood clots, and blood pressure are among the issues associated with obesity and surgery.

But there are some overlooked problems that anesthesiologists and other healthcare professionals face with obese patients. For instance, it can be more difficult to locate veins in obese patients. Also, a medical professional has to be able to figure out that if an obese patient is experiencing chest pain, whether that is just tightness due to being obese or a risky cardiac problem.

Since obesity is one of the risk factors that can’t be hidden, forgotten, or accidentally not included in one’s medical records, there is no reason that the patient shouldn’t have the opportunity to discuss their anesthesia options with their doctor before a medical procedure is performed.

 

Senate Bill Looks to Make Medicare Billing Data Public

07 Apr

A Senate bill, introduced by Senator Charles Grassley (R, Iowa), is looking to trim Medicare fraud. In the process, physician billing data would be published online, irking doctor privacy advocates.

The bill would allow people to see how much doctors earn each year from the program. The data has been kept private by a court ruling for more than 30 years. Lawmakers are looking to lift the ban in order to bring Medicare billing data public in an effort to prevent fraud.

The measure was presented to a Senate Finance Committee hearing on Medicare and Medicaid fraud on March 2, 2011. Part of the bill’s requirements would be that the Deptartment of Health and Human Services starts to publish Medicare claims and payment data on the website USAspending.gov by the end of 2012.

According to Senator Grassley, making the data public could save billions each year in taxpayer dollars.

"More transparency about billing and payments increases public understanding of where tax dollars go," Grassley said. "The bad actors might be dissuaded if they knew their actions were subject to the light of day."

Oregon Senator Ron Wyden (D) has said that he is drafting his own legislation that would make Medicare claims data available to the public.

On the other side of the argument you have the American Medical Association who says that only bad can come from publicizing the records and that those who monitor fraud already have access.

"Releasing Medicare claims data to the public does not further the goal of combating fraud, as those tasked with this responsibility already have access to the data," said Ardis Dee Hoven, MD, chair of the AMA Board of Trustees.

 
No Comments

Posted in Medicare

 

Medicare Error Rate Falling

01 Apr

CMS, or the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, set a goal to cut the Medicare fee-for-service error rate in half by 2012. According to a CMS official’s testimony in front of Congress, they are seeing progress towards that goal.

According to Deborah Taylor, CFO and director of the CMS’s Office of Financial Management, the error rate fell by nearly two percent from FY 2009 to FY 2010. Their goal is to cut the error rate from 12.4 percent to 6.2 percent by 2012.

Taylor testified alongside Health & Human Services Inspector General Daniel R. Levinson in front of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education and Related Agencies on March 17.

"We recommended that CMS take several actions to address these errors, including improving controls, educating providers and clarifying guidance," said Mr. Levinson in regards to the collaboration between CMS and HHS on developing methods of detecting and stopping payment on claims errors.

Ms. Taylor said the agency has installed automated safeguards for this year that could detect and reject payments for "medical services that are physically impossible, such as a hysterectomy billed for a male beneficiary."

She does caution that some errors can’t be corrected through automated means and that they need to be further reviewed and be susceptible to other means of correction.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services expects to process 1.2 billion Medicare claims in 2011.

 
No Comments

Posted in Medicare

 

Panel Studies Potential Health Risks of Anesthesia Use in Young Children

31 Mar

Earlier this month an FDA advisory panel met regarding a very important topic: whether or not anesthesia poses cognitive and learning disability risks when used in young children. Since this involves millions of medical procedures, the importance of this topic is pretty obvious.

There have been a number of animal studies on the subject which have led to this meeting. According to Dr. Bob Rappaport, the Food and Drug Administration’s director of the division of anesthesia and analgesia products, these studies have suggested that there may be a correlation between anesthesia exposure and brain cell death or learning problems.

The FDA panel will evaluate this research, consider what further research may be needed, and decide what if anything parents should be presented if their children will be going into surgery.

“How do we communicate what we do know at this point without causing undue concern in parents and in physicians?", asked Dr. Rappaport.

Taking a look at the animal studies more closely, rodents and monkeys that were exposed to anesthesia at an age that is roughly equivalent to children under the age of four experienced brain cell death. An additional study, one done by the FDA, found that exposing newborn rhesus monkeys to 24 hours of anesthesia resulted in poorer tests performances for memory, attention and learning.
 
"We don’t know what this means for children at this time," said Dr. Rappaport. "That’s exactly why it’s so critical that we get all of the necessary information."

It’s difficult to do similar controlled studies with children, so when examining humans, experts look to children who have learning disabilities and trace back to see if they had anesthesia when they were younger. However, this method is not considered very reliable.

In the absence of absolutely certain evidence, ultimately the dilemma is this: most young children who are being given anesthesia absolutely need the surgery performed on them. So, what do you do?

“What we know is that not giving anesthesia and appropriate medication to manage a child’s pain during surgery does have long-term adverse affects on a child – physical as well as emotional,” said Dr. Jayant Deshpande, another committee member, pediatrician and anesthesiologist who is a senior vice president at Arkansas Children’s Hospital. “So because the child needs surgery today, we are going to use the best information that we have and use the anesthetics.”

Most of the studies so far the studies have involved the common anesthetic, ketamine. Some of the questions experts still have involve dose, age or length of exposure, and how each may relate to the risks.

 

Death Sentences Postponed Over Anesthesia Drug Shortage?

08 Mar

We recently told you about the concerns over pain killng drug shortages. The issue is serious enough to have been addressed in Congress. Senator Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota and Bob Casey of Pennsylvania introduced legislation that would give the FDA the ability to require early notification from pharmaceutical companies when an issue may arise that could cause a shortage.

The next development continues to grow dire as 13 states are jointly requesting help from the federal government on how to acquire the anesthetic sodium thiopental. However, the states’ requests aren’t based on saving lives; it’s for ending them. Sodium thiopental is used as part of a lethal execution drug, however it is also used for brief surgical procedures. The shortage may force states to postpone executions. There have also been situations where states have sought alternatives, such as in Oklahoma where they used an anesthetic commonly used to euthanize animals to execute a prisoner.

Oregon is one of the 13 states that is signing the letter to the federal government. The other states signing the letter are Alabama, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Idaho, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, Tennessee, Utah, Washington and Wyoming.

While the headlines are being dominated by the need for this drug in the justice system, what can’t be lost is that a shortage of anesthesia drugs has serious life-changing implications in the medical world.

"Never before have the shortages of key drugs been so prevalent," says Sheldon S. Sones, RPh, FASCP, president of Sheldon S. Sones and Associates, a pharmacy and accreditation consulting firm based in Newington, Connecticut. "While the best strategy is to keep as far ahead of anticipated supply needs as possible, borrowing non-controlled drugs may be an option."

Sometimes shortages are sudden and unpredictable, which is all the more reason that the drug shortage needs to be addressed on a national level, whether through legislation or other means.

Another reason is that, while some states are importing drugs like thiopental, there is uncertaintly about its safeness. Unfortunately, the messenger of this concern right now is a group of death row inmates who are suing to have the imported drugs halted. While the messengers may not be popular, the message is something worth considering.

 

American Academy of Professional Coders Launches ICD-10 Resource

07 Mar

Last week, The American Academy of Professional Coders unveiled an ICD-10 resource on its website to help payers and providers comply with the mandated code sets.

“Our message is simply that ICD-10 will change everything,” said AAPC CEO Deborah Grider.

The United States will begin to officially use ICD-10 on October 1, 2013. While that is still a few years away, it is AAPC’s intent to educate and raise awareness with healthcare professionals in plenty of time before the October 1, 2013 compliance deadline.

The ICD-10 resource page on AAPC’s website includes a code conversion tool, an online application for tracking and measuring the progress of ICD-10 implementation, and interactive floor plans to show how ICD-10 affects different aspects of a doctor’s practice or health plan. Among other features is also a collection of articles discussing ICD-10.

The page also comes with interactive graphics to illustrate how the changes in coding standards will affect different aspects of a health care practice or health plan.

If you are in the medical billing industry or are part of a medical practice, the ICD-10 revisions will be about more than just coding changes. It’s going to change everything about your practice. However, if you do want to concentrate on how it will alter the coding aspect of the game that is certainly a daunting challenge. The number of diagnostic codes under ICD-10-CM will more than quadruple, going from 13,500 to 69,000. And for inpatient procedures, the number jumps from 4,000 codes to 71,000 codes.

That’s a lot of catching up to do. All of this underscores how important it is not to delay in prepping for the changes: 2013 will be here before you know it! For more on all the tools available go to the AAPC’s website.

 

Johnson & Johnson Medical Device Rejected by FDA

01 Mar

Johnson & Johnson is at odds with the Food & Drug Administration over the government agency’s rejection of the company’s medical device which administers a propofol-containing drug. Sedasys, which must be administered by an anesthesiologist, is a medical device that uses a mild sedative during routine medical tests for patients.
 
After the FDA rejected Johnson & Johnson’s request for approval, the agency requested more data involving anesthesiologists in the control group. According to the Wall Street Journal, the FDA said that it asked Johnson & Johnson for the information before the trial began, something that Johnson & Johnson denies.
 
"We did everything that we were asked to do," says Mike Gustafson, who oversees the Sedasys program at J&J’s Ethicon Endo-Surgery unit.
 
The percentage of applications for new devices to be approved by the FDA without delay dropped to 56 percent in 2009 from 74 percent five years previous. Companies pulled 17 percent of applications for new versions of devices in 2009, which was up from nine percent five years earlier. According to AdvaMed, a trade group for the medical-device industry, this was sometimes due to the fact that the FDA sought more information.
 
"It’s never been as bad as this," says David Nexon, senior executive vice president at AdvaMed.

People in the business community have criticized the FDA for changing their requirements in the middle of the approval process. This is not disputed by the government agency, which says that it does so due to the evolution of scientific findings in the years of the approval process, which may bring to light new questions.

 
No Comments

Posted in Health